Opposing Viewpoints Decision Technique

I'm considering [describe the decision you're facing]. To ensure I'm seeing all perspectives before deciding, simulate a virtual executive board debate with 4 different experts who hold contrasting viewpoints on this matter.

Create the following personas, each with different expertise and perspective:

1. The Growth Advocate: Focuses on opportunities, expansion, and optimistic outcomes
2. The Risk Manager: Concentrates on identifying potential pitfalls and protecting downside
3. The Operational Expert: Considers practical implementation challenges and resource implications
4. The Strategic Visionary: Evaluates long-term alignment with broader goals and values

For each expert:
- Provide their name, brief background, and core perspective
- Present their main arguments for or against the decision (minimum 3 points per expert)
- Include what specific evidence or experience informs their view
- Note what they believe others are overlooking

After presenting all four perspectives, please:
1. Identify the key tensions and trade-offs between these viewpoints
2. Suggest 2-3 potential compromise positions that address multiple concerns
3. Provide a balanced final recommendation that incorporates the strongest insights from each perspective

Format this as a dialogue followed by your analysis, highlighting blind spots I might have in my current thinking.